| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2416 - 2420 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Powerled Technologies Private Ltd. vs Sadikh regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 411/2020

Ernakulam

2025-08-18

approximately-7 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shiny K.S et al vs V.K.Sreedharan et al regarding partition of property.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 262/2025

2025-08-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Johny N T vs Joy N T et al regarding damages for demolition of boundary wall

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 893 / 2021

2025-08-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Sobu N.S regarding Suit for money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 694/2023

Ernakulam

2025-08-18

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs Molly Alexander regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1029/2022

2025-08-18

approximately-4 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often lacked sufficient evidence proving their case or the means of the defendants.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple petitions were dismissed due to the failure to pay required batta for processing.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were frequently dismissed because the petitioners failed to appear in court.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Steps Taken

Various petitions were dismissed due to inaction, such as not issuing notices or taking necessary legal steps.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?