| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2401 - 2405 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Aneesh E.S. vs Abhilash E.S. regarding non-prosecution of the suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1273/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K R Mani vs Lizy C.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree.

Restoration Petition

O.S. No. 377 /2014

Ernakulam

2025-08-14

approximately-10 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sudharma Girijan vs State of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit

O.S No. 62/2022

Ernakulam

2025-08-14

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Mr. Amal Dev K.B. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 239/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-14

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Track Holidays (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 225/2025

Ernakulam District, Kerala

2025-08-14

approximately-1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissing cases due to inadequate evidence proving the respondent's means to pay the decree debt.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Dismissals occurred as petitioners were absent or failed to appoint representation, leading to defaults.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Petitions were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to take steps for issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?