| Niyamam AI

Displaying 196 - 200 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. 615/2025

Kollam

2025-10-14

approximately-1 year 2 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thomas Kanakan Mathen vs Janaki regarding fixation of boundary and injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 234/2019

Kollam

2025-10-13

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anto Davassia et al vs St.Johns Baptist Church et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No.816/2015

Kollam

2025-10-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jebin. J vs Vitus Benjamin regarding breach of contract for construction work.

Civil Suit

OS 650/2024

Kollam

2025-10-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between B. Anil Kumar et al vs N. Bhaskaran Pillai et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1023/2018

Kollam

2025-10-15

approximately-7 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding defendants' financial means resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many plaintiffs filed without taking necessary procedural steps, leading to automatic dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissing cases due to the petitioner's absence from court was a frequent occurrence.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?