| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18146 - 18150 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Pattathil Chettiyam Parambil Marakkar @ Marakkarkutty vs Ummukulsu et al regarding injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 154 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-07-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nediyil Hamzakutty vs Laila et al regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 291 OF 2015

Tirur

2019-07-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thilakavathi et al vs Leelavathi et al regarding property delivery.

Execution Petition

EP 81/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 4 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Thami et al regarding decree satisfaction

Civil Suit

EP 266/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 7 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Prasad regarding EP dismissal

Execution Petition

EP 267/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 7 months, 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to pay necessary court fees or batta.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Several petitions were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner during the hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Numerous cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not take required legal steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?