| Niyamam AI

Displaying 151 - 155 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Dr.Suresh Babu vs Dr.Tina Antony regarding mandatory injunction application

Civil Suit

OS No. 528/2025

KOLLAM

2025-09-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jalaja vs Sujatha regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 207/2017

Kollam

2025-09-16

approximately-8 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Savithry et al vs Sheela regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 952/2013

Kollam

2025-09-16

approximately-12 years 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Lalitha et al vs Omana et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 775/2019

Kollam, Kerala

2025-09-17

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Sundareshan regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.908/2024

Kollam

2025-09-18

approximately-5 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

15%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees for court processes, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of sufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claims resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Failure to Take Legal Steps

Plaintiff did not take necessary legal actions such as issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

The failure of the plaintiff to appear in court contributed to an unfavorable judgment.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Legal Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?