| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1171 - 1175 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Chellamma et al vs Mani V.K et al regarding restoration of a prohibitory injunction

Restoration Petition

O.S No. 547/2018

Ernakulam District, Kerala

2024-07-29

approximately-6 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Andul Rahim T.N vs Rajagiri Christhu Jayanthi Public School et al regarding execution petition.

Execution Petition

O.S No. 1079/2017

Ernakulam

2024-07-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Amal Plywood vs Navas S regarding dismissal of suit.

O.S No. 728/2018

2024-07-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sreejith N.U vs Joseph Martin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 119/2021

Ernakulam

2024-07-30

approximately-3 years 9 months 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.M.Vasudevan vs Union of India, Tata Communications Ltd., and The Managing Director, Tata Communications Ltd. regarding termination of employment.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 900/2015

2024-07-31

approximately-11 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of evidence to support claims regarding means of payment resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take required procedural steps, causing automatic dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear for hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?