Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 126/2020

Case between Rajeev A M vs Subin Thomas regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Code No.
126
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a complaint by Rajeev A M against Subin Thomas for dishonour of a cheque issued for a loan. The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the accused guilty and imposed a fine of ₹55,000, along with a month of simple imprisonment in default of payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Pay a fine of ₹55,000 and compensation of ₹50,000 to the complainant.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found the accused guilty and imposed a fine of ₹55,000, along with a month of simple imprisonment in default of payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant proved dishounor of cheque and established legally enforceable liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has successfully proved issuance, dishonour, and non-payment despite statutory notice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, I find the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeev A M
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subin Thomas
Party Age
26
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No. 227884, Dishonour memo, Lawyer’s notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Siby Jacob Pampady
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.Vijayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Blessen G Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation to the complainant under Section 357(1) Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Out of the fine amount, a sum of ₹50,000/- shall be paid to the complainant as compensation under Section 357(1) Cr.P.C.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conviction under Section 138 NI Act and imposed a fine.
Evidence:
The accused is hereby convicted under Section 138 NI Act and sentenced to: Pay a fine of 55,000/- (Rupees Fifty-Five Thousand only).
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Imprisonment in default of payment of fine.
Evidence:
In default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for one month.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the accused in discharge of a legally enforceable liability.
Reference:
Exhibit P1
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved that the cheque was returned unpaid for the reason 'Funds Insufficient'.
Reference:
Exhibit P2
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statutory notice issued to the accused about the dishonour of the cheque.
Reference:
Exhibit P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the sending of the lawyer's notice to the accused.
Reference:
Exhibit P4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved that the accused received the statutory notice.
Reference:
Exhibit P5

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
one month

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sat, 04/20/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Malankara Plantation Limited vs Suresh S regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s QCRETE READY MIX INDIA PVT LTD vs George M Philip regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mrs.Thasni Mayin regarding offence under section 138 of NI Act.
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won