| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 8081 - 8085 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Prasad Kumar et al regarding default dismissal.

Execution Petition

EP 421/2015

Malappuram

2016-07-29

0 years, 7 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Fasal et al regarding Default in Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 422/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-07-29

0 years, 7 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Achath Badarunnisa vs Mayiladimmal Biju regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 68 OF 2016

Tirur

2016-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thalhath vs Muthu et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 790/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-07-22

0 years, 4 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdurahiman vs Aneesh et al regarding registration of document.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 264 OF 2015

Tirur

2016-07-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

41%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees for proceedings, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 41 cases (41%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims or financial status of respondents.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Plaintiffs' absence or failure to represent themselves resulted in case dismissals for default.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Incomplete Documentation Submission

Defendants often dismissed claims due to plaintiffs not producing required documents for their petitions.

Found in 6 cases (6%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation in Court

Incomplete Documentation Submission

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?