| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 5641 - 5645 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between George vs Madhavi et al regarding fixation of boundary and other reliefs.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 224/2007

Ernakulam

2025-07-01

18 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T H Abdul Azeez vs V S Salim regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 231/2025

Ernakulam District

2025-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Owner's Association Palmgrove Apartments vs M/s Ambady Tourist Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding settlement in mediation

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 378/2021

Ernakulam

2025-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 426/2025

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Antony Lal P A vs Prince P Jacob regarding a suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 708/2023

Ernakulam

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often defaulted due to failure to pay the required batta before filing petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Many petitions were dismissed due to lack of evidence regarding the means of the respondents.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Default Due to Absence of Petitioners

Numerous cases were dismissed because the petitioners did not appear in court as required.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Petitions were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to issue necessary notices to respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Default Due to Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?