Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 708/2023

Case between Antony Lal P A vs Prince P Jacob regarding a suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Antony Lal P A filed a suit against Prince P Jacob. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file a proof affidavit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court nor represented the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court nor represented the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Defendant represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony Lal P A
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prince P Jacob
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P M Ziraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Irfan Ziraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu P S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Shehin S S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bepin Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abhijith P A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V A Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldho Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen A Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Antony Lal P A vs Prince P Jacob regarding a suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between Antony Lal P A vs Prince P Jacob regarding a suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won