Company

The plaintiff, Sri. C.K. Kesavan Nair, is seeking to recover an outstanding amount from the defendant, M/S Nirman Encon Projects Pvt. Ltd, for goods supplied. The defendant failed to repay the credit purchases made towards construction work conducted for the Indian Navy.

Careon Healthcare Solutions (p) ltd is seeking recovery of a debt from Keerthy, a dealer who failed to pay for products supplied on credit. The court proceedings were ex parte due to the defendant's non-appearance.

Maneesh Sasidharan, the managing partner of Salabham Travels, filed a suit against Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd. and others for preventing the illegal repossession of a vehicle. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants attempted to seize the vehicle without due process of law.

Raghunath A.R filed a suit against Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. and its manager. The matter was settled in mediation.

Biju.K.P. filed a suit against M/s. Tecsol Electronics Private Limited and others. The court found that the plaintiff was repeatedly absent and satisfied that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.

Benny Varghese is the plaintiff who claims damages against Bussan Auto Finance India Pvt. Ltd. and others related to the purchase of a Yamaha scooter. The plaintiff alleges collusion and deficiencies in service leading to financial loss.

Roopesh Kamath filed a suit against Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. The court has referred the matter to Arbitration and closed the case.

Mini Gangadharan purchased a Volkswagen car but received a lower variant, leading to a price difference claim. She is seeking to recover the difference of Rs. 1,80,163 and compensation for mental agony.

KPB Nidhi Limited filed a suit against Ms. Geethalakshmi and others. The matter was settled in mediation, leading to the acceptance of the mediation agreement.

The case involves petitioners who are attempting to seek a temporary injunction regarding a disputed construction agreement and property ownership. The defendants are accused of fraudulently transferring ownership of properties without the consent of the plaintiffs.