Panchayat

Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs, led by Vinod V.T. and others, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and related parties. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were not ready to provide evidence.

The case involves Mulakkulam Panchayat Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. seeking execution against the judgment debtors, including Pushkaran.K.A and others. The court ultimately dismissed the execution petition for default due to the failure to file the necessary affidavit.

The case involves the Decree Holder Mulakkulam Panchayat Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Judgment Debtors Biju.P.M, Mohanan.O.N, and Salim Kumar. The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to lack of action despite repeated directions.

The plaintiff, Sunitha, initiated the suit against Udayanapuram Panchayathu. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.

The Mulakulam Panchayath Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. is the decree holder, while Pradeep V.T and others are the judgment debtors. The court dismissed the execution petition for default due to the affidavit not being filed.

Shanavas P.H. filed a suit against Mundakayam Grama Panchayath and its secretary. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Varghese Chacko is the plaintiff claiming title and possession over a property for more than 100 years. The defendants, including the Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath, are attempting to take possession of the property for constructing an Anganawadi.

The plaintiff, Philip, claims possessory rights over a property and seeks an injunction against the Erumely Grama Panchayath, which has allegedly interfered with his rights. The case involves previous ownership documents and claims of adverse possession.

Philip is the plaintiff claiming possessory rights over a property. The case involves an FIR registered against him by the defendant Panchayath regarding the removal of rubber trees from the property.