Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.79/2021

Case between Vinod V.T. et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF,VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-10-03
Duration
Case Code No.
79
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Vinod V.T. and others, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and related parties. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were not ready to provide evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence and dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence and dismissed the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff not filed proof affidavit and was not ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff not filed proof affidavit and was not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not filed proof affidavit. Not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod V.T.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shiju.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajan S
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bijoy K.J.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lalu M.S.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deputy Director of Fisheries
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fisheries Inspector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deputy Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S. Vishnu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smitha Soman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sambath Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Sreena A R vs State of Kerala et al regarding enforcement of mediation terms
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Biju M R vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sanumon P S vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissed suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Valsamma Varghese vs State Of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won