Private Individual

The case involves NATTAKOMSERVICE CO OP SOCIETY NO 3839 as the decree holder and VISHNU K V as the judgment debtor. The court has noted that no steps were taken to attach the property.

Nattakom Service Cooperative Bank No.3839 is the decree holder, represented by secretary P. Sheeba. Narayanan NR is the judgment debtor.

Nattakom Service Co-Opertive filed an execution petition against Narayanan N.R. regarding the enforcement of a decree. The court considered the petition and determined that no steps were taken to proceed.

Kottayam Vyapari Vyavasai Co-operative society Ltd. filed an execution petition against Abraham Jose and others in relation to a decree. The court recorded full satisfaction of the execution petition.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, has filed a suit for the realisation of money due from the defendants arising out of a loan transaction. The defendants, a group of individuals and a private agricultural concern, defaulted on the repayment of the loan.

The plaintiff, Preethy Agencies, sued the defendant, Ammas Enterprises, to recover an amount of ₹85,180/- for products returned. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay for the returned goods as promised.

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, has filed a suit against the defendants for the realization of a loan amounting to ₹92,666 due to default in repayment. The defendants had executed a Demand Promissory note agreeing to repay the loan with interest but failed to comply.

The plaintiffs, including The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy and its representatives, are seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants from claiming authority over the Samadhi and conducting the Shivagiri pilgrimage. The defendants assert their longstanding role in administration and deny the plaintiffs' claims.

The plaintiff, a society, sanctioned a loan to the first defendant, who failed to repay it. The other defendants were sureties for the loan.

The complainant, Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd, filed a petition for withdrawal of the case against the accused, Remya C K, under section 280 of the BNSS. The case was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.