Private Individual

The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a review petition to restore the suit on file. The respondents appeared before the court but did not file any objections.

The Branch Manager of Canara Bank filed a review petition to restore a suit. The defendants did not appear before the court, and the petition was allowed to restore the suit.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, A.Saeed, for the recovery of a loan amount that was not repaid. The defendant had taken a loan of Rs. 75,000 but failed to make the repayments despite legal notice.

M/s. Indian Bank filed a suit for realization of money against Rasheed.H. and Vahida.R., who defaulted on their G.C.C. loan. The defendants are husband and wife who borrowed a loan for personal use but failed to repay it despite repeated reminders.

The case involves M/s.Canara Bank suing M/s.Achu Chand FAB & Fancy Collection and others for the recovery of money. The suit was dismissed as not pressed on the hearing date.

The Canara Bank filed a suit against Nisha Sebastian and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants, associated as a Joint Liability Group, defaulted on their loan repayment, leading the plaintiff to seek legal relief.

The plaintiff, M/s. Indian Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, Anandavally.B. and Deepthi, for the realization of a loan amount due to the bank. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayment despite multiple notifications from the bank.

The complainant, Legendary Distributers, alleged that the accused, Asfal, failed to pay for goods purchased and issued cheques that were dishonored. The court found the accused not guilty of the offence.

R. Sreekumar, the complainant, alleged that Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran, the accused, failed to repay a cheque amounting to Rupees Eight lakhs. The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.

Santhosh Kumar is the petitioner/defendant seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against him. The plaintiffs include Mahadevar (Minor) and others, who are associated with the Anandavaleeswaram Devaswom and Travancore Devaswom Board.