Private Individual

This case involves a petition filed by the Branch Manager of Indian Bank to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. The respondent remained exparte during the proceedings.

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking to recover a loan amount of Rs. 6,10,284 from the defendant, Shibu.S., who failed to repay the loan taken for his business. The case involves the enforcement of a loan agreement and the recovery of the dues as per the terms agreed upon.

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Samson Blutark for the realization of money. The matter was settled and the plaintiff decided not to press the suit.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount that was not repaid by the defendants, M/s. Divya Traders, and its proprietor Saneesh.G. The defendants borrowed money from the bank and have defaulted on repayment, leading to this lawsuit.

The petitioners, P.J.Alexander and Jaisy Alexander, are seeking eviction of the respondent, Biju Varghese, from a shoproom located in Kollam. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent and the petitioners' need for the premises to conduct their business.

The Branch Manager of Canara Bank filed petitions to restore a suit that was previously rejected due to non-payment of court fees and to condone a delay in filing the review petition. The respondents did not appear before the court.

The case involves Bank of Baroda as the petitioner and M/s. Charms Beauty Parlour and its proprietor as respondents. The petitioner seeks to set aside a previous order and restore a related petition.

The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.

The plaintiff, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., is seeking repayment of a loan amount due from the defendant, Nazimudeen.A., who has defaulted on the payment terms. The court found in favor of the plaintiff bank, which provided evidence of the outstanding loan amount.

This case involves the State Bank of India as the Decree Holder and Vikas.V.Nair as the Judgment Debtor. The Execution Petition was filed for the enforcement of a decree.