Private Individual

M/s Uco Bank Mavoor Branch is the plaintiff seeking to recover money from M/s Zenana Metals And Home Needs and other defendants. The defendants were called absent in the proceedings.

Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Sameer and others regarding warrant issuance. The respondents did not appear, resulting in the case being dismissed for default.

Kerala Gramin Bank, represented by its Principal Officer, filed a petition under Section 55 order 21 Rule 38 of CPC. The matter was settled between the parties with a granted timeframe for payment.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking repayment of a loan amount from the defendants, M/S Mahima Supermarket and its proprietor, Jadheer Ahammed. The defendants defaulted on the loan despite multiple demands.

YES Bank Limited filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against M/s. Mullaveetil Agencies and Mrs. Faseela. The petition was dismissed as not pressed in the absence of the respondents.

M/s. Shriram Finance Limited is the petitioner seeking relief against Latha and Subeesh. The case involves an application filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.

M/s. South Indian Bank Ltd is involved in a suit against Neeraj.P.A and others for the realization of an outstanding education loan amount. The defendants defaulted on repayment of ₹3,42,689 and did not respond to notices issued by the bank.

The case involves STATE BANK OF INDIA as the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from SWATZ (POC) Private Limited and its director Swati Raj. The defendants failed to repay the sanctioned loans leading the plaintiff to file this suit.

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Smt. Vipina. K and others. The matter was settled in special mediation, and the court accepted the mediation agreement as legally executable.

M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding arbitration matters against Shafil Mohammed and others. The application was heard in the presence of the petitioner's advocate.