Bank

Nattakom Service Co operative Bank no. 3839 filed an Execution Petition against judgment debtors Sheeja Anil, Anilkumar N S, and Lalila Ashokan. The court considered the petition and noted that certain defects were not cured before closing the petition.

The plaintiff, Indian Bank, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs. 8,45,802. The defendants, having defaulted in repayment, were found liable for the loan.

Kaippuzha Service Cooperative Bank filed an execution petition against Krishnankutty K.M. The court considered the petition on November 14, 2025.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, represented by Branch Manager Billy Graham, brought a suit against the defendants regarding a settled matter. The case was dismissed as not pressed after the parties reached a settlement.

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the plaintiff and Suresh P T and others as defendants. The matter was settled, and the plaintiff decided not to press the memo.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, Soumya S and Somasekharan, for recovery of an educational loan amounting to Rs. 7,04,513 due to default in repayment. The loan was sanctioned for the first defendant's education, with the second defendant as the co-obligant.

Nattakom Service Cooperative Bank No.3839 represented by Secretary Sheeba filed an execution petition against Molamma Abraham regarding certain proceedings. The court noted that no steps were taken, leading to the closure of the execution petition.

Canara Bank filed a suit against Vysakh K S and Santhamma K R. The court delivered its judgment regarding the dismissal of the suit.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a loan amount that was not repaid. The defendants, despite several demands, failed to pay off the outstanding loan amount.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a loan amount sanctioned to their deceased father, Gopalan V.K. The loan was taken in 2014, and due to the default in repayment, the plaintiff seeks to recover the outstanding amount from the defendants.