Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 295/2024

Case between Indian Bank vs Anandu Anil et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
approximately-10 years 2 months
Case Closed
Wed, 11/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Indian Bank, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs. 8,45,802. The defendants, having defaulted in repayment, were found liable for the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay the sum of Rs. 8,45,802 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments and evidence established the plaintiff's case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments and evidence established the plaintiff's case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 8,45,802/₹ (Rupees eight lakhs forty five thousand eight hundred and two only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of Rs.4,00,000/-(Rupees four lakhs only) from the date of decree till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anandu Anil
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil K.M.
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Sanction of Education Loan, Demand Promissory Note, Loan Agreement, Statement of Account, Deed of Ratification, Copy of Letter, Acknowledgment of Debt, The letter of re fixing the installments.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepu Viswanath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dhanya Deepu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants to pay the sum of ₹8,45,802/- with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 8,45,802/- (Rupees eight lakhs forty five thousand eight hundred and two only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of Rs.4,00,000/-.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the application for the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction of Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating the sanction of the education loan provided to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal document where the defendants promised to pay back the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contractual document outlining the terms of the loan between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the outstanding balance and transaction history of the defendants' loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Deed of Ratification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the terms agreed upon by the parties regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter related to the loan agreement or its management.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document where the defendants acknowledged their debt to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: The letter of re fixing the installments
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Correspondence regarding the adjustment of loan repayment installments.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Indian Bank vs Anandu Anil et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Indian Bank vs Anandu Anil et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/10/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 11/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Laila Nazar et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Chikku Nainan et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Supriya Biju et al regarding realization of money for education loan.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between U C O Bank vs Restin K Mathew regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew Skariah et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won