Similar Cases
Based on: EP.207/2024 — Case between Saraswathy vs Kunjukuttyamma et al regarding Execution petition
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
EP. 112/2022
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Muhammad Riyas et al regarding execution petition.
Self Employers Service Society is the decree holder, and Muhammad Riyas and others are the judgment debtors. The execution petition was heard and subsequently dismissed for default when the decree holder was absent.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP.130/2023
Case between Manosh Mani vs Mini Stanly et al regarding Execution Petition
Manosh Mani is the decree holder while Mini Stanly and others are the judgment debtors. The case involves an execution petition where the decree was fully satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP.168/2024
Case between Abraham Issac et al vs Raymol Thomas et al regarding Execution Petition
The decree holders, Raymol Thomas and others, are involved in an execution petition against the judgment debtors, Abraham Issac and others. The court considered the execution petition and declared it fully satisfied and closed.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP.163/2023
Case between M.M.Publications Limited vs Adger Media Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
M.M.Publications Limited is the decree holder represented by Mathew George. The judgment debtors include Adger Media Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, who are involved in the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP.15/2018
Case between Laila Sasidharan et al vs L.P Prakash et al regarding Execution Petition
The plaintiffs are Laila Sasidharan, Lalu Divakaran, and Leena Sasidharan who are seeking execution of a decree against the defendants L.P Prakash and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. The court has closed the execution petition as the matter was not pressed by the plaintiffs' counsel.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP.164/2022
Case between Jyothilekshmi.R vs The Kottayam Wholesale Co-operative Consumer's Stores Ltd.No. K162 regarding Execution petition
Jyothilekshmi.R., the decree holder, has filed an execution petition against The Kottayam Wholesale Co-operative Consumer's Stores Ltd.No. K162, represented by its Managing Director. The court has considered the execution petition on 07.10.2025 and noted that the draft sale proclamation was not produced.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP.32/2015
Case between John Markose vs K.D Babu regarding Execution of Decree
John Markose is the decree holder seeking execution against K.D Babu, the judgment debtor. The execution petition was satisfied and closed in court.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP.74/2024
Case between M/s Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Minu regarding Execution Petition
The plaintiffs, represented by P.T. Raju and others, filed an execution petition. The execution petition was fully satisfied in court.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP.121/2025
Case between Kottayam Aided Secondary School Teachers Co-operative Society Ltd.No. 659 vs Mini. M. Mathew et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves Kottayam Aided Secondary School Teachers Co-operative Society Ltd. as the decree holder against Mini. M. Mathew and Usha Antony as judgment debtors. The execution petition was settled with full satisfaction recorded.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP.134/2024
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Biju P.J et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves Self Employers Service Society as the decree holder and multiple defendants including Biju P.J, Smitha Sunny, and Shaly Thomas. The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to no further steps taken by the decree holder's counsel.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EA 170/2021
Case between K. Subramanian vs Sreenivasan regarding execution of a decree
The case involves K. Subramanian as the judgment debtor and Sreenivasan as the decree holder regarding an execution petition. Subramanian claims that his belongings were wrongfully evicted and seeks re-delivery of the property.
Execution
OS.No.1021/2014
Case between Lalitha.C vs Sunitha Chandran et al regarding Execution application
Lalitha.C is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against judgment debtors Sunitha Chandran, Asas Andrews, and V.K.Rajendran. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner and a Surveyor to assist in executing the decree.
Execution
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.890/2009
Case between Thankachan Yohannan Soney vs M. Suda Devi et al regarding Execution of decree
Thankachan Yohannan Soney is the decree holder seeking execution against judgment debtors M. Suda Devi and Chandra Mohan. The court has closed the execution petition as satisfied based on a compromise.
Execution
Plaintiff Won
Restoration Petitiion 2854/2019
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding Restoration of Petition.
The case involves petitioners P C Cherian and Saramma Cheriyan seeking restoration of their petition against respondents T A Kurian and Grac. The petition was dismissed due to lack of medical evidence for the petitioner's claims.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 2856/2019
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding dismissal of restoration petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by P C Cherian and others against T A Kurian and Gracy. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to provide medical evidence for his illness.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 137/2024
Case between Elsamma Thomas vs Jomy Scaria et al regarding Restoration Petition
Elsamma Thomas filed a restoration petition against Jomy Scaria and others. The case was heard and decided on the same day.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 183/2022
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Surendran. T.U is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
E.P. No.23/2020
Case between Balakrishan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishan V is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd along with its director and his spouse are judgment debtors in this execution petition. The court considered the petition and closed it due to the decree holder's absence.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.24/2020 in OS No. 248/2018
Case between Rajeevan N vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Rajeevan N is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with its directors are the judgment debtors. This execution petition was considered by the court and subsequently closed due to non-representation by the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 25/2020
Case between Reshmitha M vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Reshmitha M is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court found the decree holder absent and closed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 48/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The execution petition was heard and closed due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 49/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner and decree holder in an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented and defects not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 50/2021
Case between Renuka P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Renuka P is the decree holder in this execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was closed as the decree holder was not represented and the defect was not cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 53/2021
Case between Ramesh Kumar vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Ramesh Kumar is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was heard and the court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 54/2021
Case between O P Vijayan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves O P Vijayan as the petitioner who is seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 55/2021
Case between Hilda Fernandez @ Hilda Lawrence vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Hilda Fernandez is the petitioner seeking execution of the decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its director K.N. Rajeev. The execution petition was closed due to the decree holder not being represented and the defect not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 56/2021
Case between Kalyani C vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Kalyani C is the petitioner seeking enforcement of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and other respondents. The court ruled that the decree holder was not represented and closed the execution petition due to lack of action.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 57/2021
Case between Pushpa P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
This case involves an execution petition filed by Pushpa P against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was not represented in court during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 65/2021
Case between Vijayalakshmi P K vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Vijayalakshmi P K is the decree holder and has filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder was not represented and no steps were taken.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.66/2021
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding execution petition
The case involves Meenakshi Amma as the petitioner and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with other defendants. The petition was for the execution of a decree.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2020
Case between Rajila V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Rajila V, represented by Chandrasekharan P, filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was absent during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 67/2021
Case between Chithra Sreedharan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chithra Sreedharan is the decree holder seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The case revolves around the enforcement of a decree in the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 69/2020
Case between Raghavan Adoor vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Raghavan Adoor filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 96/2020
Case between Balakrishnan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishnan V filed an Execution Petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The case was about the enforcement of a decree, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 97/2020
Case between Geetha Ravindran vs Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Geetha Ravindran, the decree holder, filed an execution petition against Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The court concluded the hearing on January 4, 2025, without representation from the petitioner.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 99/2020
Case between Chandrashekharan P vs K N Rajeev et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrashekharan P is the decree holder in this execution petition against K N Rajeev and others. The case involves the execution of a judgment, but the decree holder was not represented in court.
Execution Petition
Dismissed
EP No. 100/2020
Case between Vattakandy Sreedharan vs Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Vattakandy Sreedharan is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree. The respondents include Sigs Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. and other directors.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 103/2020
Case between O P Vijayakumar vs K N Rajeev et al regarding decree execution.
The case involves O P Vijayakumar as the decree holder and K N Rajeev along with others as judgment debtors. The decree holder was not represented, and it appears that necessary steps were not taken, leading to the closure of the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP 300124/2024
Case between M/s Trinity Traders vs Mehaboob regarding settlement of a matter.
This case involves M/s Trinity Traders represented by Joseph Varghese and Mehaboob. The matter is settled with both parties signing a memorandum of agreement.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.126/2019
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
N.M.Sivarajan filed a suit against George Varghese, Anil Varghese, and Aliyamma. The parties involved reached a compromise and the suit was disposed of accordingly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.449/2014
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, N.A.George and Sreedharan Kunjukunju, are seeking a declaration of their right to a public road and an injunction against the defendants, T.C. Ipe, Vineeth Ipe, and Ammukutty Korulla, who have allegedly obstructed access to the road. The case revolves around property and road ownership disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 824/2015
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
The plaintiffs, Abraham Philipose and Mariyamma Abraham, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, John Mathyas, George Mathyas, and Jerin Mathyas, who are obstructing their use of a road. The case involves disputes over property boundary and easement rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 300058/2024
Case between Suma S. vs Ashy Mathew regarding execution proceedings.
Suma S. is the decree holder against Ashy Mathew, the judgment debtor, in execution proceedings. The court order notes the absence of the decree holder's representation and states that no steps were taken, leading to the closure of the execution proceedings.
Execution Proceedings
Defendant Won
E.P.137/2023
Case between Saji T Kurian vs James Abraham regarding Execution Petition
The case involves decree holders Saji T Kurian and Aniyamma Saji seeking execution of a decree against judgment debtor James Abraham. The execution petition was considered on 31st January 2025.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
ST 27/2022
Case between K S nandakumar vs Ratheesh Rajamani regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
K S nandakumar is the complainant and Ratheesh Rajamani is the accused in this case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court has decided to acquit the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 52/2022
Case between Suresh P G vs Sajimon P K regarding withdrawal of complaint
Suresh P G filed a petition to withdraw the complaint against Sajimon P K. The court granted permission and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 300179/2020
Case between G Harinarayanan vs Raju R regarding withdrawal of complaint
G Harinarayanan, the complainant, filed a petition to withdraw the complaint after the entire amount was paid. The court granted permission for the withdrawal, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
EP 300088/2024
Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank is the decree holder represented by Secretary, P. Sheeba. The judgment debtors include Roy V.J., Anishkumar M.S., and Sindhu Roy.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won