Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 172/2023 — Case between Korothkandiyil Afnitha @ Hasniba vs Korothkandiyil Mami et al regarding partition and separate possession
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 135/2022
Case between KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI vs KOORIKKANDIYIL BABU @ SASIBHOOSHAN regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI, the daughter of the first defendant, who is challenging the validity of a sale deed executed by her father in favor of N. P. ASWANTH NAIR. The plaintiff claims that the sale was influenced by alcohol and is seeking a declaration that the sale deed is invalid.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 38/2024
Case between Saroja vs Sushanth et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
Saroja is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against Sushanth, Santha, and Mohanan for obstructing her access to her property. The dispute arises over the ownership and accessibility of a way that the defendants allegedly block.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
FDIA. No. 20/2022 in OS. No. 41/2018
Case between Meethale Palollathil Kannan et al vs Kuniyil Kannan et al regarding final decree application
The case involves a final decree application for partition filed by the petitioners against the respondents. The court ruled on the division of property as per a preliminary decree dated 29.09.2022.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 108 /2022
Case between VAZHAYIL POYIL MARIYAM vs PEETTOLLATHIL SHAMSUDHEEN regarding partition of property.
The plaintiffs, Vazhayil Poyil Mariyam and the deceased Puthalathankandy Moidu Haji, are seeking partition of a property against the defendant Peettollathil Shamsudheen. A preliminary decree was passed on 29.07.2023, and this order relates to a final decree application for the partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 115/2019
Case between Basheer et al vs Baburaj. C. P et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves the plaintiff Basheer who is seeking a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a pathway claimed as an easement over the property. The defendants, Baburaj and Bhaskaran, contest the existence of the pathway and have filed a counter claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 70/2018
Case between CHERIYA KALLUKKANDIYIL ASYA vs KURUKKANARIYIL MAMMAD et al regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction
The case involves plaintiff CHERIYA KALLUKKANDIYIL ASYA who claims that the defendants removed a boundary and encroached upon her property. The defendants dispute this claim and state the plaintiff is the one encroaching on their land.
Civil Suit
Partial
ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018
Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
Jashilnadh. R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against VADAKKAYIL PATHU and others, who are accused of attempting to unlawfully construct a retaining wall affecting the plaintiff's property rights. The case centers on the right of way to the plaint A schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 80/2024
Case between Peettollathil Sumesh vs Peettollathil Babu et al regarding Recovery of possession.
Peettollathil Sumesh, the plaintiff, is seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, Peettollathil Babu and Peettollathil Sunila. The case involves disputes over property rights and claims of adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 110/2022
Case between KARIMBIL ABDULKHADAR HAJI vs BABURAJ regarding Recovery of possession, Mandatory injunction, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction and for damages.
The plaintiff, Karimibul Abdulkhar Haji, is seeking recovery of possession of a property and various injunctions against the defendant, Baburaj, who is a tenant that occupies part of the property. The case revolves around ownership disputes and the defendant's unauthorized construction of a shed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 83/2025
Case between ABDURAHIMAN SAKHAFI vs AHAMMAD HAJI UNNIYANDI et al regarding declaration and injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Abdurahiman Sakhafi for a declaration that a property absolutely belongs to him and for a permanent injunction against Ahmad Haji Unniyandi and others, restraining them from trespassing or altering the property. The defendants argue that the property in dispute is a Waqf property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
FDIA 19/2024 in OS 190/2012
Case between KUNHAMI vs PATHU VALIYAPARAMBHATH et al regarding partition of property
KUNHAMI, the plaintiff, sought a final decree for partition against the defendants, who include the heirs of PATHU VALIYAPARAMBHATH. The case revolves around the division of property according to a preliminary decree issued previously.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 6/2020
Case between M. C. ANNAAKUTTY et al vs AUGUSTINE THANIYIL et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M. C. Annakutty and others, are claiming ownership of a property that they allege belonged to their deceased father, Chacko. The defendant, Augustine Thaniyil, contends that he has rightful ownership based on earlier deeds.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
FDIA 10/2024 in OS 102/2023
Case between BALAN vs KALYANI et al regarding partition of property
This case involves a partition of property among the plaintiff, Balan, and the defendants, including Kalyani and others. The court has passed a preliminary decree allowing the plaintiff to receive a share of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 64/2021
Case between KUNHABDULLA vs KUNHALI et al regarding partition of property
KUNHABDULLA, the plaintiff, is seeking a final decree in a partition suit against KUNHALI and other defendants regarding the division of property as per a preliminary decree. The property has been measured, and shares have been allocated to each party as per the court's decision.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
FDIA 18/2024 in OS 15/2021
Case between NISAR. V. P vs CHERIYADATHIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding partition of property
Nisar V. P is the petitioner seeking a final decree for partition of property against Cheriyadathil Muhammad Ali and others. This case involves the division of the plaint schedule property into equal shares as per the preliminary decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
FDIA 10/2025 in OS 128/2024
Case between MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL SULAIKHA vs MEENCHERIKKUZHIYIL KUNHIMOOSA et al regarding partition of property
The petitioner Meencherikkuzhiyil Sulaiha seeks a final decree for partition of property against the respondents Meencherikkuzhiyil Kunhimoosa and Meencherikkuzhiyil Nafeesa. The court evaluated a preliminary decree and the distribution of property shares among the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 9/2024
Case between VAZHAYIL KUMARAN vs CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, VAZHAYIL KUMARAN, seeks a declaration of his right to vehicular access through the property of the defendants, CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL and CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AZEEZ. The plaintiff claims he has an easement right due to an oral agreement with a former owner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 96/2025
Case between Akshaya vs Seena regarding declaration and partition
This case involves Akshaya, the plaintiff, seeking a declaration of civil death for her mother, Seena, who has been missing for over 11 years. The plaintiff is also requesting partition of the property inherited from her deceased father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 138/2022
Case between Nanu vs Aneesh. P. K regarding mandatory injunction
Nanu, the plaintiff, brought the suit against Aneesh. P. K, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to restore a water channel that the defendant allegedly filled, causing flooding and contamination issues. The plaintiff claims the defendant's actions have made their living conditions challenging.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 32/2022
Case between Leela vs Muchilottummal Bhaskaran et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leela and Muchilottummal Bhaskaran are involved in a dispute over the partition of a property inherited from their mother. The case also includes a claim for permanent prohibitory injunction against the fifth defendant, who has been accused of attempting to cut trees on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.531/2015
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, P.Premi and Sunila, seek recovery of possession and a mandatory injunction against the defendants, M.Rijeesh and others, who have allegedly encroached upon their property. The court found that the defendants had constructed structures on the plaintiffs' land without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.08/2022
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
The plaintiff, Bineesh, filed a suit against Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair and others regarding access to a pathway serving his property. The defendants were absent during the hearing and raised claims over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.358/2017
Case between Koroth Sandhya vs Dr.K.P.Ravi et al regarding easement rights over plaint B schedule road.
The plaintiffs, Koroth Sandhya and others, are involved in a dispute against Dr.K.P.Ravi and Dr.Shamil.P.R regarding easement rights over a road serving their property. The plaintiffs claim the right to use this road, which the defendants attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.35/2021
Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass
Malayil Balan filed a suit to restrain Nikhil from trespassing onto the scheduled property belonging to Balan's son-in-law. Nikhil counterclaimed for a mandatory injunction to restore a pathway he claimed was unjustly blocked by Balan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 229 / 2020
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction
The plaintiffs, Narmadha and others, claim ownership and possession of a property originally held under a partition deed. They seek an injunction against the defendant, Marakkath Lal, who is the legal heir of the previous owner, to prevent trespassing into the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.573/2017
Case between Sreenivasan et al vs Thondiyil Kallyani et al regarding recovery of possession of property
The case involves Sreenivasan and his legal heirs against Thondiyil Kallyani and others, concerning the recovery of possession of a disputed property. The plaintiffs claim ownership based on title deeds while the defendants allege adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 585/2018
Case between V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed vs Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank regarding mandatory and prohibitory injunction.
V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property and disputing a loan liability claimed by Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank. The plaintiff asserts he never availed any loan from the bank, while the bank claims he is liable for loans taken by a friend using the property as collateral.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.139/2018
Case between Chereekandy Gopinath vs Chereekandy Vijayan et al regarding fixation of boundaries and injunction.
This case involves Chereekandy Gopinath as the plaintiff and Chereekandy Vijayan and Vipin as defendants. The plaintiff seeks to fix the boundaries of disputed properties due to alleged encroachments by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.143/2015
Case between C.Lakshmi et al vs E.P.Velayudhan et al regarding partition and consequential injunction
The plaintiffs, C.Lakshmi and others, are seeking partition of property originally owned by late Ichutty @ Imbichutty. The defendants are E.P.Velayudhan and others, who are claiming ancestral rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 575/2018
Case between Neena Anil Kumar vs Mallika @ Baby et al regarding partition and separate possession
Neena Anil Kumar filed a suit for partition and separate possession of 6/48 share of the plaint schedule property against Mallika @ Baby and others. The case involves disputes over property rights and shares among family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.253/2020
Case between Sarika vs Sarala et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Sarika, is seeking partition of properties originally belonging to Malakkal Balan and his sister Janaki. The defendants include Sarala and her sons, who deny the plaintiff's claim for partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 91 / 2021
Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from creating any charge or alienating property allotted to the plaintiffs per a final decree. The case involves disputes arising from a partition suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 228/2018
Case between Sheeba Kottiyedath vs K.Vipin Kumar et al regarding fixation of boundary
Sheeba Kottiyedath filed a suit against K.Vipin Kumar and Divya.K.K. to fix the boundaries between her property and that of the defendants. The defendants argued that the suit was barred by res judicata due to a previous decree in a related case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 179/2021
Case between Vimala et al vs Santha et al regarding declaration of easement right and consequential injunction
The plaintiffs are seeking a declaration of easement rights over a disputed road they have used for access to their property for over 75 years. The defendants obstructed this access, prompting the plaintiffs to file the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 / 2019
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
Jose Antony is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that certain properties were purchased using his funds fraudulently by his father K.D. Antony and siblings. The case involves disputes over property ownership and claims of misrepresentation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 376/2019
Case between Sujitha vs Sathi et al regarding partition of property
Sujitha, the plaintiff, seeks a partition of properties originally belonging to her deceased father Ramankutty, which are currently in joint possession with the defendants. The defendants, Sathi, Bibeesh, and Rajan, contest the partition and assert their ownership rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 222/2016
Case between Raghuveer vs Sree Vettakkorumakan Kshethram et al regarding mandatory injunction and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff Raghuveer has sued for a mandatory and prohibitory injunction concerning the use of a property pathway, which he claims is essential for accessing his owned properties. The defendants include a temple and its management board, which assert that the plaintiff has no legal right over the disputed pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 255 / 2021
Case between Harif PN et al vs Basheer PN et al regarding partition
This suit is for partition of the plaint B schedule property. The plaintiffs, Harif PN and Ahammed koya PV, allege that they are joint owners of the property along with various defendants who are heirs of deceased family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 242/2020
Case between Edoli Pankajam vs Pulparambil Aneesh, Ralanth Kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Edoli Pankajam, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants, Pulparambil Aneesh and Ralanth Kumar, regarding a property related to the Poloor Subramania Temple. The defendants, a committee associated with the temple, argue that the suit lacks necessary parties and is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 197/2018
Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.
Komalam K.T. filed a suit against K. Rajan for recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of certain documents. The case revolves around property rights claimed by both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 14 / 2021
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
Girija filed a suit against Arunjith P, Sasikumar P, and the Secretary of Thalakulathoor Grama Panchayath seeking a mandatory injunction for unauthorized construction on her property. The plaintiff claims the construction is illegal and seeks mesne profits for its usage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.441/2023
Case between Swarnalatha M vs Kozhikode Corporation regarding property tax assessment
Swarnalatha M filed a suit against the Kozhikode Corporation challenging the property tax imposed on her flat, claiming it to be excessive compared to adjacent properties. She sought a declaration for reassessment and a prohibitory injunction against revenue recovery proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.289/2019
Case between Abdulla Barami et al vs MK Hassan et al regarding partition.
The plaintiffs, led by Abdulla Barami, sought partition of a property originally belonging to their predecessors. They allege that defendant MK Hassan, prior to his death, mismanaged the property and income derived from it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.440/2023
Case between Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam vs Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam is the plaintiff seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property gifted to him by his mother, Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam. The defendants are members of the plaintiff's family who dispute the validity of the gift.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won