Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 135/2022

Case between KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI vs KOORIKKANDIYIL BABU @ SASIBHOOSHAN regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI, the daughter of the first defendant, who is challenging the validity of a sale deed executed by her father in favor of N. P. ASWANTH NAIR. The plaintiff claims that the sale was influenced by alcohol and is seeking a declaration that the sale deed is invalid.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid case. The suit was dismissed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid case. The suit was dismissed with costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not prove the allegations of being influenced to execute the sale deed. The evidence presented supported the validity of the sale.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not prove the allegations of being influenced to execute the sale deed. The evidence presented supported the validity of the sale.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has not mounted the box. She has not proved the allegations before the court by any cogent evidences.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI
Party Age
21
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KOORIKKANDIYIL BABU @ SASIBHOOSHAN
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N. P. ASWANTH NAIR
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Assignment Deed No. 1962/2021 of SRO, Kavilumpara executed by Babu @ Sasibhooshan in favour of Aswanth Nair.
Defendants Documents
Assignment Deed No. 1257/2024, Assignment Deed No. 1036/2024, Correction Deed No. 1438/2024, Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Officer, Certificate issued by Sub Treasury Officer.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.M. Kuttikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Vimesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C.R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Decree declaring that the sale deed executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant is not valid.
Evidence:
Therefore, relief of declaration is not proved before this court.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Therefore, she cannot claim a relief of permanent prohibitory injunction from this court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Assignment Deed No. 1962/2021 of SRO, Kavilumpara executed by Babu @ Sasibhooshan in favour of Aswanth Nair.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Assignment Deeds executed by Babu @ Sasibhooshan in favour of other individuals.
Reference:
Ext.B1 to B2
Document Type: Correction Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Correction Deed No. 1438/2024 of SRO Kavilumpara executed by Babu @ Sasibhooshan in favour of Aswanth Nair.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Officer, Kavilumpara to Aswanth Nair.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate issued by Sub Treasury Officer, Thottilpalam.
Reference:
Ext.B5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Invalid sale deed
Case Code
Case between KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI vs KOORIKKANDIYIL BABU @ SASIBHOOSHAN regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI vs KOORIKKANDIYIL BABU @ SASIBHOOSHAN regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 12/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Basheer et al vs Baburaj. C. P et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between VAZHAYIL POYIL MARIYAM vs PEETTOLLATHIL SHAMSUDHEEN regarding partition of property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Korothkandiyil Afnitha @ Hasniba vs Korothkandiyil Mami et al regarding partition and separate possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meethale Palollathil Kannan et al vs Kuniyil Kannan et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Saroja vs Sushanth et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won