Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3976 - 3980 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Rahiyanath vs Nahmarali regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:6/2014 (Refiled from S.T.192/2013 of J.F.C.M-1, Tirur)

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding dishonour of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case - Offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

S.T. No:96/2012

Tirur

2014-05-27

2 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:154/2012

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Sreedharan Koomullichali regarding payment decree

Execution Petition

EP 80/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-05-24

0 years, 3 months, 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Khalid vs Liyakkathali regarding payment dispute

Execution Petition

EP 130/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-05-24

1 year, 1 month, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or showing means to pay.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps or following court directives.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were frequently dismissed when the plaintiffs were not present in court during hearings.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?