| Niyamam AI

Displaying 396 - 400 of 21810

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 535/2021

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-4 years 11 months 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Ganga. L et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 645/2023

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-11 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 535/2021

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-4 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India, Kollam vs Athira.S., G. Raveendran regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 635/2024

Kollam

2025-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yesudasan M vs Suja Jose et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 534/2024

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-2 years 2 months 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently dismissed due to non-payment of batta or other necessary fees.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissing petitions due to insufficient evidence to prove claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitions often dismissed when the petitioner fails to appear in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs frequently lost cases simply for not taking necessary procedural steps.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

No Steps Taken in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?