| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3801 - 3805 of 21973

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Navas Sherief Basheer et al vs Gladis M Charly et al regarding temporary injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 682 /2024

Ernakulam

2024-12-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Ajilesh Joseph regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 696/2024

2024-12-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Karnataka Bank Ltd vs Chackochan M J regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 911/2023

Ernakulam

2024-12-10

approximately-9 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Alexander P.J vs Thomas C.K regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1179/2022

Ernakulam

2024-12-11

approximately-2 years 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between IDBI Bank Ltd vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 916/2024

Ernakulam

2024-12-11

approximately-2 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9678

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to appear or represent themselves during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissing cases for failure to issue necessary notices to defendants was a recurring reason for plaintiff loss.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Non-Representation of Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?