| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3711 - 3715 of 21930

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mohammed Sheffik vs Murali Menon et al regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.82/2019

2023-02-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nobel Kuriakose et al vs Reji Joseph et al regarding declaration and partition of property

Civil Suit

OS. No.64/2019

2023-02-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peter George vs Mary et al regarding appointment of a Survey Commission

Civil Suit

OS No. 70/2019

2023-03-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manju Sajeev vs Govindamenon regarding a compromise suit.

Civil Suit

OS. No.13/2020

2023-02-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (Formerly known as North Malabar Gramin Bank, Kolenchery Branch, Represented by its Branch Manager) vs George C J et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Civil Suit

OS. No.61/2019

2023-03-28

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9663

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of necessary court fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove defendants' financial capacities.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Plaintiffs often failed due to not taking necessary steps to issue legal notices to involved parties.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

The plaintiffs were frequently absent during hearings, leading to automatic dismissals of their cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notice

Absence of Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?