Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3481 - 3485 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Ratheesh.K. vs Madhavan.V.V. regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 68 OF 2014

Tirur

2015-02-13

Around 8 and a half months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kizhakkevalappil Pathumma et al vs Aoobacker et al regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Proceedings

EP 204/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-13

1 year, 5 months, 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Theyyassanchery Peethambaran regarding debt settlement

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 256/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-13

0 years, 2 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Adiyattil Majeed regarding monetary dispute

Execution Proceedings

EP 32/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-11

1 year 1 month 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Managing Partner Sooraj Bankers vs V.P.Sivaraman et al regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 240/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-11

0 years, 3 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal for default in numerous cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs were unable to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

The absence of the plaintiffs or petitioners at court hearings contributed significantly to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

A recurring issue was plaintiffs' failures to take necessary procedural steps, often resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?