| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2966 - 2970 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Anu Sankar et al vs Sagar Constructions Technologies et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.153/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-10-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs M/s. CHRIST COTTON WASTE UNIT regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1294/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-10-14

approximately-2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nandana.R.P vs Biju Kumar.S et al regarding temporary injunction for lateral support

Civil Suit

O.S. 343/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-10-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Mobile World et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1093/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-14

approximately-5 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Majitha Beevi. S et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 477/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-10-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide enough evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs failed to take required legal steps, such as issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?