| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2576 - 2580 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed vs Abdul Rahiman et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 194/2021

Kozhikode

2025-01-24

approximately-3 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90/2023

KOZHIKODE

2025-01-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 355/2024

Kozhikode

2025-01-27

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 355/2024

Kozhikode

2025-01-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.531/2015

Kozhikode

2025-01-27

approximately-9 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay required batta fees, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Insufficient evidence to substantiate claims or financial means led to case dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Default in Taking Steps

Failure to take necessary procedural steps, including issuing notices, resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiffs' absence during court hearings led to dismissals for default.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Default in Taking Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?