| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2506 - 2510 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sasidharan K. vs Chandri et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 324/2019

Kozhikode

2025-02-28

approximately-5 years 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/S. Parisons Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs O. Girish Kumar regarding enhancement of fair rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 79/2020

Kozhikode

2025-02-27

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 91 / 2021

Kozhikode District

2025-02-28

approximately-3 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muraleedharan M. vs Ranjini P. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 146/2022

Kozhikode

2025-02-28

approximately-2 years 15 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sheeba Kottiyedath vs K.Vipin Kumar et al regarding fixation of boundary

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 228/2018

Kozhikode District

2025-02-28

approximately-7 years 14 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiff's case was dismissed for failing to pay required fees or costs, such as batta.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims or prove means to pay.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking steps to issue required notices to defendants.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Multiple cases saw dismissal due to the petitioner's absence in court during proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?