| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2456 - 2460 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Samanyu Sanathanan vs M/s Codea Technologies Pvt. Ltd. regarding realization of salary

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 915/2021

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd vs The Superintendent, General Hospital et al regarding Recovery of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 162/2019

ERNAKULAM

2025-08-21

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. Davis J. Akkara vs Paulose Thoma regarding a suit abatement.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 422/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

approximately-1 year 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between City Wealth Trading Solution vs Baijumon T G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 4 / 2024

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-08-21

approximately-4 years 7 months 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V B Bhaskaran vs HDFC Bank Limited et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1 3 1 2 / 20 1 9

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence Presented

Lack of evidence showing the means of the respondents resulted in petition dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Petitioners often did not take required procedural steps, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation of Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence or failure to be represented in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Lack of Representation of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?