Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2286 - 2290 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mannil Kunhalan Haji's Children et al vs Payyanatt Damodaran regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 60 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-07-26

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Paarammal Hussain vs Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 991/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-25

0 years, 3 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramachandramenon vs Venugopalan regarding possession and partition

Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession and Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 139/2014

Tirur

2017-07-25

3 years 13 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ramachandramenon vs Venugopalan regarding recovery of possession and partition

Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession and Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 139 / 2014

Tirur

2017-07-25

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Vettom Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Abdurahiman et al regarding payment dispute

Execution Petition

EP 260/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-25

1 year 11 months 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence and Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs were often absent in court or unrepresented, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs regularly did not take necessary steps to issue notices to respondents, causing case closures.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence and Lack of Representation

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?