| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2216 - 2220 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Lt. General K. Surendranath PVSM et al vs Krishnadas.K et al regarding rent control dispute.

Rent Control

EP No. 302/2024

Kozhikode

2025-04-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kuruvattoor Service Co-operative Bank vs Jabir.P.T regarding EP dismissal

EP No. 509/2023

Kozhikode

2025-04-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s.Kerala Trade Wings vs Shoukathali regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.343/2021

Kozhikode

2025-04-10

approximately-3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.527/2023

Kozhikode

2025-04-10

approximately-4 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Maharastra vs Sheheer.P regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 08/2024

Kozhikode

2025-04-10

approximately-5 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate claims or prove financial means.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner not appearing in court at the required times.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs did not take necessary actions, such as issuing notices or filing required documents.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?