| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2011 - 2015 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Mathew Thomas et al regarding settlement of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 377 of 2019

Ernakulam

2024-01-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Surabhi Jayan regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.560/2020

Ernakulam

2024-01-30

approximately-8 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raju V.K vs Suma P.V et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1112/2022

Ernakulam

2024-01-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ernakulam Medical Centre Private Limited vs Maijo.K.Augustine regarding suit dismissal for default

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1072 of 2019

Ernakulam

2024-01-30

approximately-4 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between KLM Axiva Finvest Ltd. vs Thomas Johnson regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.814/2023

Ernakulam

2024-01-30

approximately-4 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff often failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or show financial capacity.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Dismissing cases for plaintiffs not taking required actions like issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Petitioners were often absent during hearings, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?