| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19336 - 19340 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Secretary, Kalpakancheri Service Co-operative Bank Society vs Thayyil Basheer et al regarding Loan closure and satisfaction recorded

Unknown

EP 198/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-11-25

1 years, 2 months, 10 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Hussainali regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:40/2017

2019-11-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Basheer Poozhikkal et al regarding EP 46/2019

EP 46/2019

2019-11-23

0 years 9 months 21 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Sirajuddeen Pulikkathodi regarding Loan closure and satisfaction of judgment

EP 191/2019

2019-11-23

0 years 5 months 17 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Mani Paloli regarding EP 45/2019

EP 45/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-22

0 years 9 months 20 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence regarding the means of respondents or necessary documentation.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Frequent absences of plaintiffs during hearings led to dismissals for lack of representation.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?