| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18431 - 18435 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Sivadasan Chakkanth et al regarding decree enforcement.

Injunction

EP 344/2018

Malappuram

2019-03-29

0 years, 3 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suresh vs Balan regarding Enforcement Petition

Enforcement Petition

KLML130001782019

Malappuram

2019-03-28

0 years, 1 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Neelakandanan Chakkanath et al regarding decree execution.

Execution Petition

EP 321/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-03-28

0 years, 3 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sasidharan vs Kalathiparambil Palleema Hajjumma et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 228 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kavungil Shihabudheen vs Thayyil Muhammed regarding money.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 4 OF 2019

2019-03-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Secure Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of necessary batta fees to progress their petitions.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases dismissed due to plaintiffs' inability to present sufficient evidence regarding the means of respondents.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissals occurred frequently when the petitioner failed to appear in court for hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Non-Pursuit of Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed when no steps were taken to notify or pursue action against the respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Secure Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Non-Pursuit of Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?