| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17181 - 17185 of 22110

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed Noufal et al vs Behanan George regarding Eviction

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 08/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Kidilam Mens Wear and Footwear et al regarding rejection of plaint

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 84/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sareena Azeem vs Tata Motors Finance Limited et al regarding maintainability of the suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 21/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. Sherly Antony vs Mrs. Sheeja Rajaneesh regarding a suit involving mediation

Civil Suit

O.S No. 88/2021

Ernakulam

2025-07-21

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Miczo Kft vs Vilangapurath Yedhu Vijayan regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 493/2023

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-07-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9747

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs consistently failed to produce essential documentation supporting their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Several plaintiffs did not pay required court fees or batta, resulting in their petitions being dismissed.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred due to insufficient evidence showing the financial means of defendants to pay debts.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Action or Steps

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary steps to advance their cases, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Court Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Action or Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?