| Niyamam AI

Displaying 961 - 965 of 21884

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mahesh Hariharan vs Pushpa Chandran, Thomas J regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 170/2022

Pala

2025-11-27

approximately-3 years 5 months 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Santhosh vs Prasanna regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 149/2017

Pala

2025-11-29

approximately-8 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between St. Mary’s Financiers vs Mini Johnson regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 160/2022

Pala

2025-11-29

approximately-4 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vineeth Raj vs Arun A. S regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 106/2022

Pala

2025-12-05

approximately-3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between S. Prakash et al vs The Kerala State et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 232/2022

Pala

2025-12-18

approximately-3 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9640

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay mandatory court fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Insufficient evidence presented by plaintiffs resulted in dismissals due to inability to prove necessary claims.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Plaintiffs often failed to appear in court, causing their petitions to be dismissed for default.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs' lack of action, such as issuing notices or responding, led to case dismissals for default.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?