Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 796 - 800 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Ayishummu vs Kunhappa regarding fixing of boundary and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit - Fixation of Boundary and Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No.101 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-11-29

5 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Karthiayani Amma et al vs Lakshmikutty regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 144 OF 2010

Tirur

2017-11-29

7 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Meleveetil Vijayan vs Mannamparambil Damodharan Chettiyar regarding eviction

Civil Suit - Eviction

EP 209/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-29

0 years, 2 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Menothiyil Sreenivasan vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding debt repayment dispute

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) NO. 1 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-11-28

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Uppiliyath Krishnankutty vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd regarding unpaid investments

Original Petition (Pauper)

ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No. 94 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-28

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence Presented

Lack of sufficient evidence to show the respondent's financial capacity was a common reason for case dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to issue notices to the respondents as mandated.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Plaintiffs often failed to represent themselves in court, leading to case dismissals for non-appearance.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Lack of Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?