| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 6336 - 6340 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Puthukkudi Valapppil Ayishummu vs Muhammadunni et al regarding Decree

Unknown

EP 56/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-13

0 years 9 months 7 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdulla et al vs Rayin Kutty et al regarding Delivery effected

Unknown

EP 160/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-11-13

0 years 7 months 3 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Thennal Service Co-operative Bank vs Faisal.M et al regarding Default on Decree

EP 208/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-13

1 years, 1 months, 18 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Sreenivasn vs Sasidharan et al regarding Petition filed u/o 26 Rule 1 and u/o 33 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code

Original Petition

ORIGINAL PETITION (Indigent) No. 6 OF 2019

2019-11-12

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Medamman Fathima Suhara vs Muhammed Kutty regarding EP 78/2019

EP 78/2019

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-11-12

0 years, 8 months, 27 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Plaintiffs frequently neglected to take steps to issue notices to respondents, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?