| Niyamam AI

Displaying 56 - 60 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 601/2024

Kollam

2025-11-20

approximately-1 year 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sindhu vs Sathyan regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 603/2021

Kollam

2025-11-20

approximately-5 years 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sreelekshmi.M.B. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 610/2022

Kollam

2025-11-21

approximately-4 years 5 months 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs M/s ARC Render regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 889/2024

Kollam

2025-11-21

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sankara Narayan Kurup vs Ramachandran Pillai et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No.781/2017

Kollam

2025-11-22

approximately-8 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiff failed to provide essential documentation required to substantiate their claims or position.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiff did not pay the required batta fees for proceedings, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

The plaintiff was not present in court when the case was called, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissal of the case.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?