Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 541 - 545 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mis Alhind Tours and Travels Pvt.Ltd vs Firos Chalakkaparambil regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 140/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-02-27

0 years, 8 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs V.P.Musthafa and Shihab regarding default in Execution Petition

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 247/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-02-27

0 years, 3 months, 12 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Basheer and Beeran et al regarding eviction and subletting issues

Rent Control Petition

RCP 22/2015

Tirur

2018-02-27

2 years 11 months 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Basheer vs Beeran et al regarding eviction petition

Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION Nos. 22 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-02-27

2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkkutty's children et al vs Mangodi Ashraf regarding eviction

Civil Suit - Eviction

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 32 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-02-27

1 year 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to not paying the necessary advance fees for filing and service processes.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps to advance their cases, like issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not appear in court when required.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?