| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4111 - 4115 of 22092

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Devaki et al vs Padmakshi et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 311 / 2022

2024-09-28

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr.Radha Devi vs Sunil Kumar C.S regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 836/2021

Ernakulam

2024-09-30

approximately-11 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Purnima Papers vs Irshad regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 278/2024

Ernakulam

2024-09-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Eternal Fashion and Beauty et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 386/2023

Ernakulam

2024-09-30

approximately-7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashish Kumar P.P et al vs Nair Service Society et al regarding declaration and recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 806/2021

Ernakulam

2024-09-30

approximately-6 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9740

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Lack of adequate evidence to support claims often resulted in dismissals in favor of defendants.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Non-Representation by Plaintiffs

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not appearing in court or showing up.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently did not issue required notices, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Absence of Evidence

Non-Representation by Plaintiffs

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?