| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4026 - 4030 of 22054

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Maxima vs Tressa Ruth et al regarding supplementary final decree

Civil Suit

O.S.No.888/2007

Ernakulam

2024-10-23

approximately-7 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moncy Jacob et al vs B Viswanath et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S.No.755/2024

Ernakulam

2024-10-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jasmine et al vs Abdul Rahim P.K et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1152/2017

2024-10-25

approximately-7 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Mr. Nithin Anand regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 302/2020

Ernakulam

2024-10-25

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shaija Saji vs Greeshma M. regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 391/2023

Ernakulam

2024-10-25

approximately-1 year 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9721

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals frequently occurred due to plaintiffs not providing adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Many petitions were dismissed because of the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Some cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps, like issuing notices.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?