| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2921 - 2925 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Seena G.C regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No 1541/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-27

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayan.M vs Sindu Edwin regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 196/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1380/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-28

approximately-10 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayakumar vs Vijayan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and putting up of boundary.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1830/2016

THIRUVANAAPURAM

2025-11-28

approximately-9 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Chithra et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.322/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-28

approximately-9 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple dismissals occurred due to failure to pay necessary court fees, resulting in case defaults.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish defendant's ability to pay.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Numerous cases were dismissed because the petitioners did not appear in court during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Plaintiffs frequently defaulted by not taking necessary procedural actions required for progress.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Take Steps in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?