| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2831 - 2835 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Praveen Kumar. S.S vs NISH et al regarding prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 27/2017

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-19

approximately-8 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between R.Ramesh Kumar vs Jyothilekshmi.T regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1383/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-19

approximately-4 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between B.Thulaseedharan vs Deepu.S regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.2091/2014

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-20

approximately-13 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kosamattom Finance Ltd vs Suma Sumesh et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.2008/2016

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-20

approximately-12 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Body corporate vs M/s. Nalina Stores et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.1964/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-20

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees leading to dismissal of petitions for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Petitioners were not present during hearings, resulting in dismissal of cases.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Document Production

Failure to produce necessary documents led to dismissals in multiple cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often did not provide enough evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Petitioners

Lack of Document Production

Insufficient Evidence Provided

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?