| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2731 - 2735 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Suraj RamaChandran vs Vanajavally regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 192/2024

Ernakulam

2024-06-20

approximately-0 years 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Alice Chacko vs Rolin Sunil et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 242 /2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-31

approximately-1 year 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs RATHEESH. K regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 98/2025

Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-09-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS 123/2022

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-09-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M. K. Abdul Rahman vs Hameed P. K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Criminal Case

S.T. No. 20/2024

Nadapuram

2025-09-15

approximately-3 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed cases due to not paying necessary court fees required for proceedings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Numerous petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear at court hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?