| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2716 - 2720 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Deepthidas et al vs Viji.R et al regarding dispute settled through mediation

Original Suit

Original Suit No. 380/2020

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-08-25

approximately-5 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sarada vs Deepthi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Original Counter Claim

OS 112/2024

Varkala

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aslam et al vs Nasimudheen et al regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 169/2025

2025-08-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Premalatha et al vs Priyanka et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 223/2023

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-08-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Union Bank of India vs Arunlal. S. regarding realization of loan amount

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 137/ 2023

Varkala

2025-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to support claims resulted in plaintiffs' petitions being dismissed.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take required procedural steps, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Plaintiffs' failure to appear in court often led to their petitions being dismissed.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?