| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2386 - 2390 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Cander Architects and Builders vs Devi TK et al regarding realization of an amount due

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 303 / 2021

Kozhikode

2025-07-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vimal Kumar vs Babitha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 451 / 2020

Kozhikode

2025-07-23

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between PK Ummer et al vs Nayeem Ahammed et al regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 276/2022

Kozhikode

2025-07-23

approximately-8 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gokuldas KT vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 29/2023

Kozhikode

2025-07-25

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gokuldas KT vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 29 / 2023

Kozhikode

2025-07-25

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of necessary fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner or their legal representation in court.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence

Dismissals often occurred because plaintiffs did not present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Several petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to issue necessary notices to the defendants.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?