| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2361 - 2365 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr.Sameer KK regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.18/2025

Kozhikode

2025-12-04

approximately-8 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashraf vs Sikkanthar et al regarding arrears of rent.

Civil Suit

O.S.No.169/2022

Kozhikode

2025-12-04

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Arya Publishing House vs Sajeevan regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.226/2024

Kozhikode

2025-12-04

approximately-4 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnoth Firdous et al vs T Abdul Karim regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fees.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.195/2025

KOZHIKODE

2025-12-08

approximately-2 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suharabi.C et al vs Muhammed Nafih.K.V regarding arrears of rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 18/2025

Kozhikode

2025-12-08

approximately-6 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence concerning the means to pay or support claims led to many dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Cases

Failure to take necessary procedural steps resulted in case dismissals for many plaintiffs.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Frequent absences of petitioners in court led to dismissals of their cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Cases

Non-Representation of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?